User talk:MrBosnia

September 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Wintersun. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — madman bum and angel 08:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must understand there is only ONE other entity apart from the Republic of Srpska and the Federation, it is the Brcko District. There is no such thing as fourteen entities in BiH. After the Dayton Agreement, two principal entities were formed: RS 49% and FBH 51%, along with a third entity which is compromised in both RS and Fed. Here is a map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Map_Bih_entities.png

I therefore hope you will stop editing the useful information on the Bosnia & Herzegovina page and stop misinformating our users. User:Boris4c 01:25, 6 November 2007 (CET)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Bosnia and Herzegovina has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --Ronz 00:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you reverted multiple editors changes, all with an edit summary that made it appear you were only removing a single editor's changes. [1] --Ronz 01:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The game versus Poland

The game versus Poland was fully official for Bosnia and Herzegovina nationale football team. The FIFA put this game in official fixtures calendar . They don't publish unofficial ones . No matter they played in the strongest team or youth . If the papers were sent to FIFA the game is fully official. Bartekos (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Interesting, I don't have a MySpace. ♠K | ☢ 06:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sonata Arctica

Please do not rever the removal of images and cleanup efforts of Sonata Arctica. The images were removed per WP:FU and the tables were cleaned up to proper formatting per WP:MoS and WP:CHARTS. Thanks - eo (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repka

Pa kretenu, jes' ti glup ili sta je s tobom? Jebem te u sljivu, danas Ciro objavio spisak a ti se pravis budala i pojebajes stranicu nase Repke, stidi se!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 18:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo rotalju,

ko si ti matere ti, neki cetnik sto zabotira repku ili sta? Brines se o artiklu nase repke a ne znas koje pozvan, nesto mi je tu suhveli? Ali, zato sto smo mi bosanci fini ljudi evo ti link: [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 15:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evo matere ti, kad si tako sjeban u tintari da ne znas nac ili neces, pravis se budala, evo, evo serem ti se usta: [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 11:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnia national team

What is the reason behind this revert? BanRay 15:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left him a message, he said he had a source so I'm somewhat confused. BanRay 21:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Bosnia and Herzegovina national football team#Notable BiH Players - this list is a clear case of original research, is entirely subjective and has no clear inclusion criteria. It is unsourced, and should be removed per WP:V. Knepflerle (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re [4]: No material was removed - tags like this are a way of asking other editors to find and add sources to articles. Knepflerle (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Football Bosnie-Herzégovine federation.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Football Bosnie-Herzégovine federation.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]